data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8ea98/8ea9820300ca204c1355603f73f27b9f498bd86e" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/97656/97656f72bff7b6cef920d53b3ac7efa2de728557" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/00392/003923ec11af02abbfbe9873c0d714ff2b87f599" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0e538/0e53831bb9bfeff5f5dc694f4fb0464dbc862398" alt=""
Digital photography today: very sharp, very colourful. As if that wasn't possible in the Twenties. Look at that March'26 enclosure, or the market picture I made today with the very-low-budget Brownie.
But that was not their aim! Yes, of course there was technical development; very, very interesting. But expression, composition, substance (is that the right word?) that was what they (I, we?) were looking for.
Is Max's photograph (1924) not a hundred times better than mine?
And another thing: today we tell the world proudly it was made with the Hasselblad, the Nikon etc.. Look what Max tells us.
Geen opmerkingen:
Een reactie posten