data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/52fe5/52fe5975ac8fa28f89d65ae5afaaf50da812db81" alt=""
Jeroen used Tri-X 320 (220film) and Ilfotec HC 1+31, I plunged my HP5 in Rodinal 1:50 as usual; we both overexposed 2 stops because snow has to be white.
About vintage photography, old cameras, technique
Over 800 years old. Imagine that! (The beautiful Знаменский собор opposite, look below, click on Label Великий Новгород , is almost 50...
Jouw uitsnede is beter, voor de diepte is de 5cm niet nodig in dit geval! Hoewel een scherpe voorgrond wel aardig is.
BeantwoordenVerwijderenIk weet het nog zo net niet - van die uitsnede.
BeantwoordenVerwijderenInteresting to compare contrast and detail between the two; the 50mm seems the winner, with the 90mm having the old time effect.
BeantwoordenVerwijderenDefinitely - the AGI is not for landscape I think, more an urban type.
BeantwoordenVerwijderenInteresting experiment. I like them both.
BeantwoordenVerwijderenThe sharpness and contrast of the 50mm but also the more 'dreamy' structure of the AGI
Anastigmat. I wonder why it is such a soft landscape with that lens...
Its great for old buildings, because of that softness. Symmetrical lenses like anastigmats have that.
BeantwoordenVerwijderen